Slackware News
Inviato: lun 17 lug 2006, 11:34
Riporto la mail spedita a slackit:
----------------
Per chi non ha l'abitudine di guardare il changelog della -current,
Patrick finalmente si è un pò sbilanciato, e dopo una 15ina di giorni di
completo
stop ( vacanze estrive ? ), afferma che...
- ---
Fri Jul 14 18:31:20 CDT 2006
We *are* getting closer to 11.0, friends.
I'm hoping for a larger changeset soon, but this should be fun to play with
for now as I work on the TODO list; merging, compiling, and initial
testing.
- ---
Con tanto di announcio "semi" ufficiale che un pò tutti si aspettavano:
- ---
kernels/huge26.s/*: Upgraded huge26.s kernel to 2.6.16.24.
The name of the big kernel with many built-in options has been changed
from
test26.s to huge26.s to reflect that Slackware 11.0 will consider the
2.6.16.x kernel series to be a supported kernel series.
- ---
( e qui scatta finalmente il trenino!!)
Ma, giusto per non smentirci troppo...
- ---
However, I'm
probably going to leave the bare.i 2.4.32 kernel as the default kernel (or
perhaps sata.i?) as it has very good performance and probably better
security
due to the simpler and longer-tested design"
- ---
Ma direi che va più che bene cosi :)
----------------
----------------
Per chi non ha l'abitudine di guardare il changelog della -current,
Patrick finalmente si è un pò sbilanciato, e dopo una 15ina di giorni di
completo
stop ( vacanze estrive ? ), afferma che...
- ---
Fri Jul 14 18:31:20 CDT 2006
We *are* getting closer to 11.0, friends.
I'm hoping for a larger changeset soon, but this should be fun to play with
for now as I work on the TODO list; merging, compiling, and initial
testing.
- ---
Con tanto di announcio "semi" ufficiale che un pò tutti si aspettavano:
- ---
kernels/huge26.s/*: Upgraded huge26.s kernel to 2.6.16.24.
The name of the big kernel with many built-in options has been changed
from
test26.s to huge26.s to reflect that Slackware 11.0 will consider the
2.6.16.x kernel series to be a supported kernel series.
- ---
( e qui scatta finalmente il trenino!!)
Ma, giusto per non smentirci troppo...
- ---
However, I'm
probably going to leave the bare.i 2.4.32 kernel as the default kernel (or
perhaps sata.i?) as it has very good performance and probably better
security
due to the simpler and longer-tested design"
- ---
Ma direi che va più che bene cosi :)
----------------