Il satellite vede ghiaccio, ma non il suo spessore.Luci0 ha scritto:http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm
Il satellite allora non vede niente?
Dave Barber dice:
Codice: Seleziona tutto
But Barber said the satellite imaging technology was actually recording thin, slush ice.
"We thought it (the Arctic sea ice) was recovering and this was a positive thing," Barber said of the commonly-held scientific view. "We found the satellites were mis-classifying the ice that was there.
"We found very little, true multi-year ice at all and it was all this rotten slush ice that we were driving our ship through."
Barber has been conducting research in the Arctic every year since 1981. His findings took him by surprise.
"This is not something we were expecting at all. It was a total surprise to everybody who works in the Arctic -- what does the ice actually look like."
niente foche da cacciare,
gli orsi bianchi muoiono di fame,
pare che mangino perfino i loro piccoli.

